Social vulnerability indicators are critical understanding and addressing differences in experience and recovery from environmental hazards. In Tanzania, these indicators are particularly relevant because the country faces various natural and socioeconomic challenges. The aim of this manuscript is to outline the key measures of social vulnerability in the Tanzanian context based on the literature and studies. Introduction: Similar to many developing countries, Tanzania faces a variety of challenges that exacerbate the social vulnerability of its population. Factors such as poverty, limited access to education and inadequate health systems contribute to the country's vulnerability to environmental shocks and extreme events. Understanding and measuring social vulnerability is critical for effective policymaking and risk reduction efforts. Methodology: The methodology includes a review of the literature on indicators of social vulnerability, with a focus on those applicable to the Tanzanian context. Criteria are established for evaluating these indicators to ensure that they are consistent with the theoretical framework and have internal consistency. Results: The Social Vulnerability Index (SoVI) is a widely used measure, although its application is limited to specific contexts such as Tanzania. Other studies emphasize the connection between government-identified indicators of child vulnerability and access to education and provide insights into additional factors that predict educational vulnerability. In addition, social protection programs in Tanzania provide a range of potential indicators of vulnerability that can be used to help monitor the progress of poverty reduction strategies. Discussion: This discussion addresses the implications of these findings for Tanzania's policy and planning. This emphasizes the need for context-specific measures that accurately reflect the country's unique socioeconomic and cultural landscape. Conclusion: This manuscript highlights the importance of developing reliable and contextually relevant indicators of social vulnerability for Tanzania. Such measures are crucial for developing targeted interventions and strengthening the resilience of vulnerable populations to environmental and socioeconomic threats.
Published in | Advances in Applied Sciences (Volume 9, Issue 4) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.aas.20240904.13 |
Page(s) | 99-109 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Social Vulnerability, Tanzania, Environmental Hazards, Policy, Resilience
[1] | Statista. (2021). Tanzania: Number of households 2017-2021. Retrieved from |
[2] | Wisner, B., Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., & Davis, I. (2004) At Risk: Natural Hazards, People’s Vulnerability and Disasters. Routledge. |
[3] | Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., Davis, I., & Wisner, B. (1994). At Risk: Natural Hazards, People’s Vulnerability and Disasters. New York: Routledge. |
[4] | Qulahen, Greg, Mortsch, Linda, Tang, Kathy, Harford, Deborah (2015). Unequal Vulnerability to Flood Hazards: “Ground Truthing” a Social Vulnerability Index of Five Municipalities in Metro Vancouver, Canada. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 105(3): 473–495. |
[5] | Dow, K. (1992). Exploring Differences in Our Common Future(s): The Meaning of Vulnerability to Global Environmental Change. Geoforum, 23: 417-436. |
[6] | Cutter, S.L.; Boruff, B.J.; Shirley, W.L. (2003). Social Vulnerability to Environmental Hazards. Social Science Quarterly, 84(2): 242-261. |
[7] | Bogard, W.C. (1989). Bringing social theory to hazards research: conditions and consequences of the mitigation of environmental hazards. Sociological Perspectives, 31: 147-168. |
[8] | Hewitt K., 1997. Regions of Risk: A Geographical Introduction to Disasters. |
[9] | Statista. (2025). Tanzania: Forecast of household size 2021-2025. Retrieved from |
[10] | World Population Review. (2024). Family Size by Country 2024. Retrieved from |
[11] | Save the Children International. (2023). 2023 REPORT Tanzania. Retrieved from |
[12] | Save the Children International. (2024). 2022-2024 COUNTRY STRATEGIC PLAN - Save the Children International. Retrieved from |
[13] | World Population Review. (2024). Single Parent Rates by Country 2024. Retrieved from |
[14] | Statista. (2021). Tanzania: Average household size. Retrieved from |
[15] | Census.gov. (n.d.). Families and Households. Retrieved from |
[16] | MacroTrends. (2024). Tanzania Urban Population 1960-2024. Retrieved from |
[17] | Worldometer. (2024). Tanzania Population (2024). Retrieved from |
[18] | World Bank Group. (n.d.). DataBank World Development Indicators Online (WDI) database: Tanzania indicators [2021]. Retrieved from |
[19] | Bank of Tanzania. (2024). MONTHLY ECONOMIC REVIEW April 2024-bot.go.tz. Retrieved from |
[20] | TanzLII. (n.d.). Land Acquisition Act - TanzLII. Retrieved from |
[21] | Statista Market Forecast. (n.d.). Real Estate - Tanzania | Statista Market Forecast [2024 Retrieved from |
[22] | Average Salary in Tanzania 2024 - The Complete Guide. Retrieved from |
[23] | Tanzania Unemployment Rate 1960-2024 | MacroTrends. Retrieved from |
[24] | The Unemployment rate of Tanzania (2020 - 2028... - GlobalData. Retrieved from |
[25] | Tanzania - Gross Domestic Savings (% Of GDP) - 2024 Data 2025 Forecast... Retrieved from |
[26] | Tanzania - national debt 2029 | Statista. Retrieved from |
[27] | Tanzania Tax System- 2024 Update. Retrieved from |
[28] | Tanzania Economy - 2024 Update. Retrieved from |
[29] | Daylight Saving Time 2024 in Tanzania - timeanddate.com. Retrieved from |
[30] | Tanzania Presents Landmark TZS 47.4 Trillion Budget for 2024/25. Retrieved from |
[31] | Tanzania - Gross Savings (% Of GDP) - 2024 Data 2025 Forecast 1990-2020... Retrieved from |
[32] | National Bureau of Statistics, Tanzania. (2020). National Bureau of Statistics, Tanzania. Retrieved 25 December 2024, from |
[33] | Cooper F, Lewis EG, Urasa S, Whitton L, Collin H, Coles S, Wood GK, Ali AM, Mdegella D, Mkodo J, Zerd F, Dotchin C, Gray WK, Walker RW. Social Vulnerability, Frailty, and Their Association With Mortality in Older Adults Living in Rural Tanzania. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2022 Oct 6; 77(10): 2050-2058. |
[34] | Kabisch, S., Jean-Baptiste, N., John, R., Kombe, W.J. (2015). Assessing Social Vulnerability of Households and Communities in Flood Prone Urban Areas. In: Pauleit, S., et al. Urban Vulnerability and Climate Change in Africa. Future City, vol 4. Springer, Cham. |
[35] | Carmen, E., Fazey, I., Ross, H. et al. Building community resilience in a context of climate change: The role of social capital. Ambio 51, 1371–1387 (2022). |
[36] | Hall, C.E., Wehling, H., Stansfield, J. et al. Examining the role of community resilience and social capital on mental health in public health emergency and disaster response: a scoping review. BMC Public Health 23, 2482 (2023). |
[37] | Derakhshan S, Emrich CT, Cutter SL (2022) Degree and direction of overlap between social vulnerability and community resilience measurements. PLoS ONE 17(10): e0275975. |
[38] | Bergstrand, K., Mayer, B., Brumback, B. et al. Assessing the Relationship Between Social Vulnerability and Community Resilience to Hazards. Soc Indic Res 122, 391–409(2015). |
[39] | Ntontis, E., Drury, J., Amlôt, R., & Rubin, G. J. (2020). What lies beyond social capital? The role of social psychology in building community resilience to climate change. Traumatology, 26(3), 253-265. |
[40] | Bergstrand, K., Mayer, B., Brumback, B., & Zhang, Y. (2015). Assessing the Relationship Between Social Vulnerability and Community Resilience to Hazards. Social Indicators Research, 122(2), 391–409. |
[41] | World Bank Group. (n.d.). DataBank World Development Indicators Online (WDI) database: Tanzania indicators [2021]. Retrieved from |
[42] | National statistical Bureau 2022 report |
[43] | Cooper, F., Lewis, E. G., Urasa, S., Whitton, L., Collin, H., Coles, S., Wood, G. K., Ali, A. M., Mdegella, D., Mkodo, J., Zerd, F., Dotchin, C., Gray, W. K., & Walker, R. W. (2022). Social vulnerability, frailty, and their association with mortality in older adults living in rural Tanzania. The Journals of Gerontology: Series A, 77(10), 2050–2058. |
[44] |
Brooks, N. (2003). Vulnerability, risk and adaptation: A conceptual framework (Tyndall Centre Working Paper No. 38). Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research and Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment (CSERGE), School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia.
https://www.ipcc.ch/apps/njlite/srex/njlite_download.php?id=5463 |
[45] | Sato, T., Shuin, Y. Assessing Historical Landslide Risk Management Based on Trigger Magnitude and Consequences: A Case Study from the Rokko Mountains, Kobe, Japan. Geotech Geol Eng (2024). |
[46] | Avvisati, F. The measure of socio-economic status in PISA: a review and some suggested improvements. Large-scale Assess Educ 8, 8 (2020). |
[47] | Stössel, J., Baumann, R., & Wegner, E. (2021). Predictors of student teachers’ ESD implementation intention and their implications for improving teacher education. Sustainability, 13(16), 9027. |
[48] | Colles, A., Liow, L. H., & Prinzing, A. (2009). Are specialists at risk under environmental change? Neoecological, paleoecological and phylogenetic approaches. Ecology Letters, 12, 849 - 863. |
[49] | Boukili IE, Flaris AN, Mercier F, et al. Prehabilitation before major abdominal surgery: Evaluation of the impact of a perioperative clinical pathway, a pilot study. Scandinavian Journal of Surgery. 2022;111(2). |
APA Style
Hamisi, S. H. (2024). Assessing Indicators of Social Vulnerability in Tanzania: A Comprehensive Analysis. Advances in Applied Sciences, 9(4), 99-109. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aas.20240904.13
ACS Style
Hamisi, S. H. Assessing Indicators of Social Vulnerability in Tanzania: A Comprehensive Analysis. Adv. Appl. Sci. 2024, 9(4), 99-109. doi: 10.11648/j.aas.20240904.13
@article{10.11648/j.aas.20240904.13, author = {Salum Haji Hamisi}, title = {Assessing Indicators of Social Vulnerability in Tanzania: A Comprehensive Analysis }, journal = {Advances in Applied Sciences}, volume = {9}, number = {4}, pages = {99-109}, doi = {10.11648/j.aas.20240904.13}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aas.20240904.13}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.aas.20240904.13}, abstract = {Social vulnerability indicators are critical understanding and addressing differences in experience and recovery from environmental hazards. In Tanzania, these indicators are particularly relevant because the country faces various natural and socioeconomic challenges. The aim of this manuscript is to outline the key measures of social vulnerability in the Tanzanian context based on the literature and studies. Introduction: Similar to many developing countries, Tanzania faces a variety of challenges that exacerbate the social vulnerability of its population. Factors such as poverty, limited access to education and inadequate health systems contribute to the country's vulnerability to environmental shocks and extreme events. Understanding and measuring social vulnerability is critical for effective policymaking and risk reduction efforts. Methodology: The methodology includes a review of the literature on indicators of social vulnerability, with a focus on those applicable to the Tanzanian context. Criteria are established for evaluating these indicators to ensure that they are consistent with the theoretical framework and have internal consistency. Results: The Social Vulnerability Index (SoVI) is a widely used measure, although its application is limited to specific contexts such as Tanzania. Other studies emphasize the connection between government-identified indicators of child vulnerability and access to education and provide insights into additional factors that predict educational vulnerability. In addition, social protection programs in Tanzania provide a range of potential indicators of vulnerability that can be used to help monitor the progress of poverty reduction strategies. Discussion: This discussion addresses the implications of these findings for Tanzania's policy and planning. This emphasizes the need for context-specific measures that accurately reflect the country's unique socioeconomic and cultural landscape. Conclusion: This manuscript highlights the importance of developing reliable and contextually relevant indicators of social vulnerability for Tanzania. Such measures are crucial for developing targeted interventions and strengthening the resilience of vulnerable populations to environmental and socioeconomic threats. }, year = {2024} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Assessing Indicators of Social Vulnerability in Tanzania: A Comprehensive Analysis AU - Salum Haji Hamisi Y1 - 2024/12/31 PY - 2024 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aas.20240904.13 DO - 10.11648/j.aas.20240904.13 T2 - Advances in Applied Sciences JF - Advances in Applied Sciences JO - Advances in Applied Sciences SP - 99 EP - 109 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2575-1514 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aas.20240904.13 AB - Social vulnerability indicators are critical understanding and addressing differences in experience and recovery from environmental hazards. In Tanzania, these indicators are particularly relevant because the country faces various natural and socioeconomic challenges. The aim of this manuscript is to outline the key measures of social vulnerability in the Tanzanian context based on the literature and studies. Introduction: Similar to many developing countries, Tanzania faces a variety of challenges that exacerbate the social vulnerability of its population. Factors such as poverty, limited access to education and inadequate health systems contribute to the country's vulnerability to environmental shocks and extreme events. Understanding and measuring social vulnerability is critical for effective policymaking and risk reduction efforts. Methodology: The methodology includes a review of the literature on indicators of social vulnerability, with a focus on those applicable to the Tanzanian context. Criteria are established for evaluating these indicators to ensure that they are consistent with the theoretical framework and have internal consistency. Results: The Social Vulnerability Index (SoVI) is a widely used measure, although its application is limited to specific contexts such as Tanzania. Other studies emphasize the connection between government-identified indicators of child vulnerability and access to education and provide insights into additional factors that predict educational vulnerability. In addition, social protection programs in Tanzania provide a range of potential indicators of vulnerability that can be used to help monitor the progress of poverty reduction strategies. Discussion: This discussion addresses the implications of these findings for Tanzania's policy and planning. This emphasizes the need for context-specific measures that accurately reflect the country's unique socioeconomic and cultural landscape. Conclusion: This manuscript highlights the importance of developing reliable and contextually relevant indicators of social vulnerability for Tanzania. Such measures are crucial for developing targeted interventions and strengthening the resilience of vulnerable populations to environmental and socioeconomic threats. VL - 9 IS - 4 ER -